Education for Peace in Iraq Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 522223500
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 2026709093
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Arms Control, Peace
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $308,297
- Expenses
- $263,442
- Assets
- $49,370
- Liabilities
- $11,570
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Erik Gustafson (Executive Director)
- Gheed Saeed (Vice President)
- Zeena Abdul-Rahman (President)
Highest reported compensation
- Erik Gustafson (Executive Director): $98,110 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To act as a rights-based development organization focused on climate and the environment, good governance, and human security in Iraq through groundbreaking field work, research, policy analysis, and advocacy.
What it reported doing in 2025
FIELD-BASED PROJECTS: Supporting Iraqi-Led Environmental Action, Public Health Monitoring, and Youth Healing In 2025, EPIC advanced locally led field work in Iraq through partnerships with trusted Iraqi civil society organizations addressing urgent environmental, public health, and humanitarian needs. EPICs field-based work focused on practical, evidence-based initiatives that helped Iraqi partners document harms, raise public awareness, engage officials, and offer solutions. With the Iraq Health Access Organization (IHAO) in Baghdad, EPIC helped restore public access to real-time air quality information after the citys only public monitor went offline. EPIC assisted IHAO in procuring and installing an open-source air quality monitor in central Baghdad and launching the public website Baghdadi Breeze, giving residents, researchers, advocates, and officials renewed access to live pollution data in a city of nearly 9 million people. IHAO also began using the project to engage international organizations and seek cooperation with Iraqi environmental authorities. With Waterkeepers Iraq in Sulaymaniyah, EPIC supported work documenting Iraqs water crisis and advancing locally grounded river protection. Waterkeepers Iraq completed five field trips to photograph the rapid decline of rivers near Sulaymaniyah, pairing 24 archival images with 24 current images to create the Vanishing Rivers exhibition. The exhibition opened at the Culture Factory, expanded to a second venue at Paia Studio, distributed more than 100 photobooks, and engaged students, academics, environmental advocates, officials, diplomats, and the public. Waterkeepers Iraq also helped document toxic oil spills, contributing to public pressure and official action, while EPIC supported practical water solutions including a mobile wastewater treatment demonstration unit and advocacy for expanded wastewater treatment. With Humat Dijlah in Nasiriyah, EPIC supported the Environmental Duties campaign on river pollution. Humat Dijlah published an evidence-based policy paper on pollution affecting the Euphrates and Gharraf rivers, met with Dhi-Qar environmental officials, trained 13 journalists and bloggers in environmental advocacy, produced 10 environmental radio messages for a 60-day public awareness campaign, and released a short companion video that received more than 27,000 views. EPIC also continued supporting vulnerable children through the Summer of Hope program, in partnership with the Iraqi Children Foundation and the American University of Iraq, Sulaimani. The eight-week program provided 27 orphaned and conflict-affected children with a safe space for English, art, STEM, yoga, life skills, mentorship, and healing. These field-based activities demonstrated EPICs core approach: support trusted Iraqi partners, combine evidence with storytelling, and help communities move from urgent problems to practical action.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 95% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 93% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 84
- Transparency & Controls: 77
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 36
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 80.1%; rating input score 80
- Program expense ratio: 93.7%; rating input score 94
- Fundraising efficiency: $43.23 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Limited
- Conducts field audits: Limited
- May suspend future funding: Limited
- Requires financial reports: Pass
- Conducts site visits: Limited
- Requires grant agreements: Pass
- May require repayment: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 74.5%; rating input score 74; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 14.5%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.19; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.23; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 37.2%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.9% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.4% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -7% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 80.1% of revenue deployed · 93.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $247K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $98K · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 26 of 27 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors and foreign activity
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2011 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 15/100.