Education for Employment

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
820578781
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
New York, NY, USA
Phone
2024645218
Rating
73
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
International Development

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$4,444,363
Expenses
$4,446,569
Assets
$3,326,246
Liabilities
$530,624

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

24 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANDREW BAIRD (PRESIDENT/CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • ANDREW BAIRD (PRESIDENT/CEO): $298,911 total reported compensation
  • ASHLEY E BARRY (VP - STRATEGY & IMPACT): $161,113 total reported compensation
  • SARAH K LITTLE-SENIOR DIR (OF PROGRAMS & BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT): $158,938 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To create employment opportunities for young people in the middle east and north africa through career training in vocational, technical, managerial and professional skills.

What it reported doing in 2025

Since its inception in 2016, efe-saudi arabia has connected saudi youth with employment skills and opportunities while providing businesses with skilled young talent. Efe-saudi arabia develops practical training programs aligned with workforce requirements, preparing job-ready and retainable employees. In 2025, efe-saudi arabia completed phase ii of the "league of women it" project with the jpmorgan chase foundation, providing entry-level job training & placement (jtp) in ict skills. Efe-saudi arabia also completed its second project with ccc: the economic development for saudi young women phase ii program, an intensive five-day training initiative designed exclusively for young women, equipping them with essential professional, interpersonal, and digital skills to enhance their employability and workplace performance. Furthermore, efe-saudi arabia completed the "build your future your way" program, funded by the hyatt hotels corporation, delivering a comprehensive five-day learning experience in riyadh and jeddah that equipped beneficiaries with the behavioral, professional, and interpersonal competencies needed for workplace success and employment in the hospitality sector. Under the "future-ready mena: future of work skills and digital readiness in mena" project, funded by the caterpillar foundation, efe saudi arabia equipped unemployed saudi youth with employability and digital skills through a market-driven, 35 hour training in riyadh, culminating in direct employer engagement and interviews. Conducted in bahrain by the efe-saudi arabia team, the amazon web services program, funded by aws, targeted bahraini young men and women, with a strong emphasis on inclusivity and equal opportunity, including youth with disabilities. It was delivered through a five-day intensive, in-person format combining interactive workshops, practical simulations, and individual mentoring sessions. Furthermore, the snapchat augmented reality (ar) hackathon, funded by snapchat and its local saudi office, was a two-day immersive, hands-on training event designed to equip saudi youth with the skills to create ar experiences using snapchat's lens studio. Under the "beauty for a better life" program, funded by the loral foundation, efe-saudi arabia trained unemployed saudi women, equipping them with the technical, professional, and interpersonal skills required to succeed in the beauty and retail sectors. Lastly, in collaboration with the saudi kickboxing federation, the tomouhi excellence training program was designed to empower saudi female referees with the skills and competencies needed to obtain accreditation from both local and international federations.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 63% of its reported program spending out as grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 69
  • Transparency & Controls: 69
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 26
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 70.8%; rating input score 71
  • Program expense ratio: 70.8%; rating input score 71
  • Fundraising efficiency: $14.81 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
    • Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
    • Requires narrative reports: Fail
    • Conducts field audits: Fail
    • May suspend future funding: Fail
    • Requires financial reports: Fail
    • Conducts site visits: Fail
    • Requires grant agreements: Fail
    • May require repayment: Fail
  • Grant itemization coverage: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -0%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.75; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.16; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 22.9%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -2.2% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.1% per year; rating input score 100; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 70.8% of revenue deployed · 70.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 8 filed program accomplishments · $3.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $299K · 24 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 38 of 39 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 7 of 8 not reported.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 49/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 26/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 25/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 13/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 39/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.