Education Exchange Institute Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
813898172
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2018–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Gainesville, FL, USA
Phone
3528703736
Rating
35
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Education

Reported finances

Revenue
$60
Expenses
$1,220
Assets
$121,440
Liabilities
$4,429

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • FIELDING JOHN (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • ZHOU LEI (SECRETARY)
  • ZHOU LILY (TREASURER)
  • FIELDING JOHN (PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

It was set up for the purpose of encouraging and facilitating the exchange of educational expertise between the US and other countries.

What it reported doing in 2025

Educationa Exchange WorkshopsThe workshop comprises of visiting primary and middle schools in Florida, attending trainings and lectures byeducation experts, exchanging educational ideas with American schools and families, as well as experiencing American lifestyl.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 38
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1,933.3%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 99.54; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -52.7% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -33.4% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1.4% per year; rating input score 0; 33rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2018 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 19/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.