Edmonds Food Bank

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
842209131
IRS 990 coverage
2019–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Edmonds, WA, USA
Phone
4257785833
Rating
89
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Food Banks, Pantries

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$4,215,812
Expenses
$3,974,708
Assets
$2,420,800
Liabilities
$83,868

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KATHERINE C DAVIS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • KATHERINE C DAVIS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $133,446 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Edmonds food bank works to support those seeking food and nutrition security in the greater edmonds community with a vision of a food-secure community.

What it reported doing in 2024

At edmonds food bank, the volunteers and staff continued to engage with our customers as we provided food, household supplies, personal products, and referrals to partner organizations for additional support. Due to ongoing economic issues, household use of efb remains high. We offer in-person shopping for those with special dietary needs, in addition to our online, drive-up, and delivery services. We continue our delivery services to support households of seniors or persons with disabilities each week. Our online ordering system gives customers the right to choose the foods they need and want each week. Many of our customers appreciate the service as it enables them to receive their food efficiently and friendly, thus freeing up time for other activities. We have continued our pop-up pantries throughout the community, including partnerships with latino educational training institute (leti), st. Albans church, college place schools, Washington west african center, and the korean community services center, providing support to increasing numbers of customers who cannot access the food bank due the restricted hours allowed at our current location. In addition, we added support for the coalition of health workers for migrants and refugees, scriber lake alternative high school and summer programs at Washington kids in transition. Over 300 volunteers (36,531 hours of support) commit to our purpose across our 257 distributions, providing 40,561 households (131,218 individuals) with a week's grocery support.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 93% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 65% of its reported program spending out as grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 86
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 48
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 86.6%; rating input score 87
  • Program expense ratio: 91.6%; rating input score 92
  • Fundraising efficiency: $21.14 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5.7%; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.61; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 3.4%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 19.2% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 13.8% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 11.1% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 86.6% of revenue deployed · 91.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $3.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $133K · 14 people listed
  • Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 53/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.