Edith L Patterson Community General Hospital Trust
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 366217703
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2015
- Location
- Prophetstown, IL, USA
- Phone
- 8157182270
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $43,919
- Expenses
- $28,811
- Assets
- $1,032,608
- Liabilities
- $18,615
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- TOM DENSMORE (TRUSTEE): $400 total reported compensation
- MARK ZUMDAHL (TRUSTEE): $400 total reported compensation
- DON VOGEL (TRUSTEE): $400 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To benefit cgh hospital
What it reported doing in 2025
The organization contributes funds annually to cgh hospital. The trustees meet with with officers of cgh hospital as necessary to review needs of the hospital. Although not required, there has been a focus on needs in the pediatric department
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 68
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 70
- Sustainability: 67
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 86.8%; rating input score 87
- Program expense ratio: 59.1%; rating input score 59
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Limited
- Other executive compensation review process: Limited
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 34.4%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 35.84; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.2%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 23% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.4% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 86.8% of revenue deployed · 59.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 2 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $17K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $400 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 15 of 15 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2016 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 59/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 14/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 20/100.