Edison-computech Parent Teacher Student Organization

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
931208089
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2023
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2023
Location
Fresno, CA, USA
Phone
5599032548
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Parent/Teacher Group

Reported finances

Revenue
$18,531
Expenses
$24,599
Assets
$17,021
Liabilities
$25,038

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ROSANNA PUENTES (President)

People named in this filing

  • ROSANNA PUENTES (President)
  • EMMA AMANN (Treasurer)
  • TOBAISE BROOKINS (Chairman)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The primary activity of the edison-computech parent teacher student organiztion is to support two of fresno's public schools; edison high school and computech middle school. The ediso-computech ptso awards scholarships to graduating students from edison high school. Fundraisers are held to assist both schools in providing computers, field trips, etc for the benefit of the students. The organization is staffed by volunteers.

What it reported doing in 2023

Student scholarships - senior students interested in recieving scholarships are encouraged to enter an essay contest. A committee is formed by the ptso to choose a topic for the essay, and selects criteria that each essay must satisfy. The committee then reads through al entries, eventually selecting several winners.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 26
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -32.7%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.69; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.47; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -4% per year; rating input score 0; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -1.3% per year; rating input score 0; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 18/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 36/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 4/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.