Edison Athletics Booster Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN: 990833190
IRS 990-EZ coverage: 2025–2025
Forms available: Form 990-EZ 2025
Location: Stockton, CA, USA
Rating: 72
Verdict: SUPPORTED
Rating confidence: Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue: $70,596
Expenses: $44,281
Assets: $65,205

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

Suzanne Wilson (Chief Executive Officer)

People named in this filing

Suzanne Wilson (Chief Executive Officer)
Gabriel Leal (Chief Financial Officer)
Richie Lynch (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The main goal of the organization is 1 Fundraising: Raising money for specialized equipment uniforms uniforms technology and facility improvements. 2 Volunteer Support: Providing staffing for concession stands ticketing chaperone services and organizing events. 3 Program Enhancement: Covering costs not covered by the school district budget to ensure programs are sustainable and competitive. 4 Fostering Community Spirit: Boosting attendance at events and building community engagement around school programs. and finally 5 Supporting Students: Investing in academic recognition competition travel for robotics debate or arts and sometimes scholarships.

What it reported doing in 2025

The organization is here to help a public school system keep sports and competition for student athletes going strong.

Operating model

Revenue model: Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model: Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filed totals do not add up.

Rating breakdown

Financial Efficiency: 72
Transparency & Controls: 82
Sustainability: 63
Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

Mission deployment rate: 59.5%; rating input score 59
Program expense ratio: 94.8%; rating input score 95

Transparency & Controls

Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

Operating margin: 37.3%; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.47; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

Program expense growth: Limited
Revenue growth: Limited
Asset growth: Limited

Details

Where the money goes: 59.5% of revenue deployed · 94.8% of spending went to programs
Governance: Filed governance answers
Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $42K in reported program spending
Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
Schedules: 2 filed schedules
Contacts: How to reach this organization
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 59/100.
Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.
Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 58/100.
Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.