Eden Ems Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
383807032
IRS 990 coverage
2018–2018
Forms available
Form 990 2018
Location
Eden, TX, USA
Phone
3258695507
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$755,708
Expenses
$821,899
Assets
$152,245
Liabilities
$44,320

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • TOMMY J WRIGHT (PRESIDENT,CEO)
  • RICHARD D THOMAS (VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • RICHARD D THOMAS (VICE PRESIDENT): $93,300 total reported compensation
  • TOMMY J WRIGHT (PRESIDENT,CEO): $77,800 total reported compensation
  • PATRICIA THOMAS (SECRETARY, TREASURER): $17,000 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our mission, in fulfilling our legacy, is to provide the following services and goods for the councho county hospital district, menard county hospital distrct, and such other governmental hospital or emergency districts as the board of directors of the corporation shall determine: pre-hospital care at basic life support level with mobile intensive care units and/or emergency ambulances; dispatch of and prompt response of ambulances to emergency incidents; training, education and certification of personnel required to provide quality health care at emergency scenes; provide pre-hospital treatment and trauma and serious illness; and provide scheduled transfers and transportation by ambulances for patients requiring same in a non-emergency situation.

What it reported doing in 2018

Eden ems inc. Provides emergency medical services to the community of eden and concho county. Eden ems inc. Continues to work with the community by providing emergency medical services.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 89
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 72
  • Sustainability: 15
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -8.8%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.19; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.29; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 22.9%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 1 of 1 board members independent · 3 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $822K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $93K · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 16/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 9/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 29/100.