Eden Arts Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
923624050
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Brooklyn, NY, USA
Phone
7183718648
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$66,915
Expenses
$71,404
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

1 person listed

People named in this filing

  • Michelle Isaac (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Eden Arts Inc also provides performing arts programming to local public and private schools in NYC & California through its Residency Program. The Residency Program is tailored specifically for each school and provides instruction that is centered in: 1. Diverse Dance Training/Strong Technique Classes 2. Cultural Experiences & Connections, 3. Personal Exposure & Opportunities to gain Experience 4. Development of Writing and Public Speaking Skills and 5. The Cultivation of Creativity & Innovative Skills. Aside from providing arts programming and entertainment, Eden Arts Inc gives back to local communities within NYC through time and service. Each year the company participates in various community initiatives such as Toy Drives, Coat Drives, Walks, and Benefit Concerts/Events.

What it reported doing in 2025

N 2018, Eden Arts Inc launched a pre-professional program/second company called IFE Youth Dance Theater. The purpose and mission of IFE Youth Dance Theater is to give young, gifted dancers access to intense technical training, professional performance experience, and artistic development. In 2020, the company continued to expand, and launched a dance school, Eden Center for the Performing Arts.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 23
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -6.7%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -44.1% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -131.4% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
  • Consistency: 4 of 5 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 32/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.