Ed Snider Youth Hockey & Education
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 202885113
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Phone
- 2159524196
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Winter Sports
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $10,922,018
- Expenses
- $10,267,389
- Assets
- $23,519,442
- Liabilities
- $881,484
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
29 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SCOTT THARP (PRESIDENT)
- PAUL TROY (FIRST VICE PRESIDENT, LEGA)
- LAKISHA HARVEY (SECOND VICE PRESIDENT)
- JAN KOZIARA (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT)
- KATY HSIEH (VICE PRESIDENT, DEVELOPMEN)
Highest reported compensation
- SCOTT THARP (PRESIDENT): $416,645 total reported compensation
- JAN KOZIARA (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT): $147,390 total reported compensation
- KATY HSIEH (VICE PRESIDENT, DEVELOPMEN): $137,300 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of ed snider youth hockey & education is to create opportunities for under-resourced youth of the greater philadelphia region to prosper in life. Our core values are accountability, excellence, inclusiveness, integrity, opportunity, and teamwork.
What it reported doing in 2024
Life skills and leadership: snider hockey's life skills curriculum is age-specific and focuses on helping students acquire critical life attributes such as accountability, responsibility, self-confidence, and teamwork. The leadership council provides students with unique opportunities to build and demonstrate leadership skills while sharing student-led feedback during strategic decision-making. Play (purposeful learning for active youth) of the month are themed lessons designed to practice emotion-management / coping skills. Curricula is mindfully designed for rising adolescence. Social-emotional learning is applied through the coaching boys into men (cbim) and the olweus bullying prevention curricula. (continued on schedule o.)trained staff delivers tangible lessons related to intimate partner violence prevention, including weekly cbim playbook lessons before/during/after hockey practice, as well as a practical program to prevent and/or reduce bullying in elementary, middle, and junior high schools (students 6 to 15 years). Students are also trained in "soft and "hard" skills that enable good first impressions, the maintenance of positive relationships, and conflict resolution. Career development: career development programming enables students to learn marketable, job-embedded skills, while networking with partner organizations throughout secondary and post-secondary education. As student-athletes progress through academic courses, snider hockey connects students with paid internship and career exploration at comcast corporation, philadelphia youth network, allied universal, pspca, j. Wood platt trust, exelon, blb&b, techgirls, peco, wharton, university of the sciences, and other area universities. Snider hockey has adopted "realizing gainful and rewarding employment" as a hallmark of our impact statement and have prioritized the importance of achieving related outcomes. Snider hockey students completed a over 3,000 hours of life skills programming during the 2024-25 season. This includes service-learning opportunities, leadership council activities, virtual life skills activities, outdoor life skills activities, and life skills lessons delivered to our travel hockey teams. A total of 30 snider hockey students were placed in meaningful, paid summer internship positions through partnerships with comcast and university of the sciences in 2024 and 2025. A further 25 snider hockey students were placed into the j. Wood platt caddie scholarship program. 20 additional snider hockey students participated in initiatives aimed at introducing concepts in finance and stem through partnerships with the wharton school of business, tech girlz, and y-tac.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Affiliate-supported. 66% of the money available for current operations came from contributions from related organizations.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 74
- Transparency & Controls: 88
- Accountability: 87
- Sustainability: 61
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 77.3%; rating input score 77
- Program expense ratio: 82%; rating input score 82
- Fundraising efficiency: $8.62 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 96.3%; rating input score 96; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 6%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.29; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.8%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.2% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.1% per year; rating input score 100; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 77.3% of revenue deployed · 82% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 26 of 27 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $8.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $417K · 29 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $150K reported
- Consistency: 39 of 39 current checks pass
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 34/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 57/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 37/100.