Ed Liebman Memorial Scholarship Award

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
852354693
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Canton, GA, USA
Rating
55
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Golf

Reported finances

Revenue
$89,287
Expenses
$77,500
Assets
$13,256

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Vanessa Mullen (Trustee Treasurer)
  • Denise Killeen (Chair)
  • Barney Liebman (Vice-Chair)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Pro-Am golf tournament with Legends of the LPGA players at Bridgemill golf course. Sponsorships donations and entry fees collected raised $20,000 for Sloan Kettering Pancreatic Division for Cancer Research. Additionally we will give 3 graduating seniors scholarships who will go play college golf who has shown leadership in golf and academics. Total scholarship money given was $5000.

What it reported doing in 2025

We presented The David M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research at Sloan Kettering a check for $20,000 for research to help find a cure. We have been provided a newletter from Sloan Kettering that show their advancements in research and choose their foundation from a list of 5 possible centers working in pancreatic cancer research.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 95% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 30
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 42
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 28%; rating input score 28
  • Program expense ratio: 32.3%; rating input score 32

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 13.2%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.17; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 85.7% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 71.1% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 160.1% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 28% of revenue deployed · 32.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $25K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 28/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 32/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 17/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.