Economic Innovation Group Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 462450336
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 2028393713
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Research Institutes and/or Public Policy Analysis
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $5,679,893
- Expenses
- $5,806,034
- Assets
- $9,370,955
- Liabilities
- $2,169,643
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- John Lettieri (PRESIDENT & CEO)
- Jennifer Nordquist (Executive Vice President)
Highest reported compensation
- John Lettieri (PRESIDENT & CEO): $535,307 total reported compensation
- Adam Ozimek (Chief Economist): $364,029 total reported compensation
- Jennifer Nordquist (Executive Vice President): $348,188 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
See schedule o
What it reported doing in 2024
The organization is engaged in advocacy, coalition building, educational, and public relations activities that will provide a forum and resource for the creation, discussion, and execution of innovative economic policy. 2024 program service accomplishments ==================================== the economic innovation group (eig) publishes economic research reports and policy analysis and makes them available for educational purposes to the general public on eig's website: www.eig.org. Eig's key achievements for 2024 include: research focused on economically distressed communities and boosting economic dynamism. ------------------------------------------------------------------- eig published five major research projects in 2024, including "the american worker project" featuring original eig research, public opinion research, and a wide-ranging series of guest essays; a reimagined version of our flagship distressed communities index with a powerful interactive map that illuminates our country's economic divides; a report and digital interactive titled "the great 'transfer'-mation" illuminating the nation's reliance on income from government; a report titled "heartland visas: a policy primer a national public opinion survey exploring american voter's opinions about high-skilled immigration; and a digital interactive map tracking state noncompete laws. Policies to support economically distressed communities and boost economic dynamism. ------------------------------------------------------------------- eig worked with congress on bipartisan policies, including: to boost mobility for american workers by restricting the use of non-compete agreements; to strengthen retirement security for tens of millions of hardworking americans through a long-term savings program; and to boost high-skilled immigration to communities struggling with demographic decline. Eig regularly updates the opportunity zones activity map, an interactive digital portal highlighting innovative investments, funds, and initiatives launched across the country, and leads a working group of wide-ranging stakeholder organizations to share opportunity zones best practices, technical information, developments, and facilitate peer-to-peer learning. Eig worked with a bipartisan group of policymakers to improve the opportunity zones policy and ensure its alignment with congressional intent. Outreach and events ------------------------------------------------------------------- eig expanded its reach with the acquisition and relaunch of "the new bazaar" podcast and the "agglomerations" newsletter. Eig convened and participated in economic research and policy conversations with a wide array of partners, stakeholders, and policymakers throughout the year focused on economic research and policy issues, including place based policy; efforts to support entrepreneurs and small businesses; understanding the challenges faced by american workers and distressed communities; promoting inclusive access to capital; spotlighting the importance of high-skilled immigration; and other foundational economic issues.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 94% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 79
- Transparency & Controls: 80
- Accountability: 72
- Sustainability: 33
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 89.6%; rating input score 90
- Program expense ratio: 87.4%; rating input score 87
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 75%; rating input score 75; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -2.2%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.61; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.23; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 32.2%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 12.7% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 10.5% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 18.9% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 89.6% of revenue deployed · 87.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 4 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $5.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $535K · 9 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $861K reported
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 26/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 40/100.