Ecole Parents Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 832445976
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2021
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 6467661843
- Rating
- 89
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Parent/Teacher Group
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $98,824
- Expenses
- $112,038
- Assets
- $168,921
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MARCELO VITA (PRESIDENT)
- DEVON LAWRENCE (VICE PRESIDENT - MATERNELLE)
- MATTHIEU SERVIAT (VICE PRESIDENT - ELEMENTARY)
- AMY MOK (VICE PRESIDENT - MIDDLE SCHOOL)
People named in this filing
- MARCELO VITA (PRESIDENT)
- ANNABELLE ZABETIAN (TREASURER)
- EMMA HESSLER (TREASURER-ELECT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To support the children's educational experience and promote communication between parents, faculty, and administration, with the goal to strengthen the school community.
What it reported doing in 2024
Provided a structure that organizes volunteers, helps with communication, organizes community events, sponsors speaker series and establishes means to integrate new families.published a periodic e-newsletter that informs parents about association initiatives, news, tips, events, plans, etc.in concert with the administration, contributing to the pa section of the family handbook and special guides for new parents, especially expatriate parents.explored other networks and actions to improve everyday parent communication and build parent community.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 56% for direct work, and 44% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 98
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 45
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 95.3%; rating input score 95
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -13.4%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.51; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 16.6% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12.1% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 33.4% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 95.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $107K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 28/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 58/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.