Eco Kids Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
923652165
IRS 990 coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2023
Location
San Antonio, TX, USA
Phone
4323125958
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Environmental Education and Outdoor Survival Programs

Reported finances

Revenue
$69,867
Expenses
$65,748
Assets
$13,942
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ALBA JAZMIN SANABRIA LOZANO (PRESIDENT / DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • IVAN O HERNANDEZ REYES (TREASURER / DIRECTOR)
  • ALBA JAZMIN SANABRIA LOZANO (PRESIDENT / DIRECTOR)
  • ALEXA HERNNDEZ SANABRIA (YOUTH REPRESENTATIVE / SECRETARY (N)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Ecokids nbsp; foundation nbsp; is nbsp; a nbsp;501(c)(3) nbsp; public nbsp; charity nbsp; established nbsp; to nbsp; promote nbsp; environmental nbsp; education nbsp; and nbsp; ecological nbsp; awareness nbsp; among nbsp; children nbsp; and nbsp; families nbsp; in nbsp; san nbsp; antonio nbsp; texasthe nbsp; organization nbsp; conducted nbsp; after-school nbsp; and nbsp; weekend nbsp; workshops nbsp; focused nbsp; on nbsp; recycling nbsp; water nbsp; conservation nbsp; and nbsp; tree nbsp; planting nbsp; more nbsp; than nbsp;800 nbsp; students nbsp; participated nbsp; in nbsp; hands-on nbsp; environmental nbsp; learning nbsp; activities nbsp; during nbsp; the nbsp; year

What it reported doing in 2024

Eco kids club inc. Incurred program expenses exceeding the total cash contributions received during the year because a significant portion of its activities were funded through in-kind donations volunteer services and grant reimbursements from prior-year awards. The organization does not maintain debt or unpaid liabilities all expenses were covered through donated goods volunteer support and previously allocated grant funds.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 89% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 86
  • Transparency & Controls: 85
  • Accountability: 88
  • Sustainability: 48
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 94.1%; rating input score 94
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 81.8%; rating input score 82; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5.9%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.21; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 94.1% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $84K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 17 of 19 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule D land buildings reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.