Eco-cycle Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 840730811
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Boulder, CO, USA
- Phone
- 3034446634
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Recycling Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $10,954,908
- Expenses
- $11,213,868
- Assets
- $8,664,294
- Liabilities
- $1,315,708
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
20 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KJ MCCORRY (PRESIDENT)
- CATHERINE GREENER (VICE PRESIDENT)
- SUZANNE JONES (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- SUZANNE JONES (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $145,292 total reported compensation
- CECILIO LECHUGA-MORADO (MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR): $140,074 total reported compensation
- KALIN STOVALL (MAINTENANCE MANAGER (THRU 8/24)): $130,475 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Eco-cycle's mission is to innovate, implement, and advocate for local and global zero waste solutions to foster a more sustainable, equitable, and climate-resilient future.
What it reported doing in 2024
Recycling of materials from commercial and residential collections for the benefit of the community and the environment. Also, education of the community concerning the importance of recycling and composting, and zero waste as a climate solution. Processed and marketed over 50,000 tons of single-stream recyclable materials and millions of pounds of hard-to recycle materials from commercial and residential sectors; collected recyclables and organic waste from hundreds of boulder county businesses; conducted over 1,500 environmental education presentations impacting over 40,000 students and teachers in 115 schools in 3 public school districts; educated over 1,300 community members in benefits of recycling and composting and engaged them in local and statewide campaigns to pursue the adoption of policies to expand recycling access and endmarkets in Colorado. Eco-cycle also led coalition efforts to ensure the adoption of a detailed, effective implementation plan for Colorado's ground-breaking producer responsibility for packaging recycling program, slated to begin providing expanded access to recycling services in mid-2026. Eco-cycle also led successful efforts to pass legislation establishing a producer responsibility recycling program for small-and medium-format batteries. Eco-cycle continued to engage in zero waste policy discussions at the national level as co-founders of the alliance of mission based recyclers (ambr) and as members of the u.s. Plastics pact on how to rebuild and expand authentic recycling and reduce unnecessary single-use plastics. Eco-cycle launched two new schools into our green star schools program, now totaling 68 public schools, which implements integrated recycling and composting programming and helps schools divert as much as 67% of their waste. Eco-cycle connected schools, restaurants and small businesses that produce clean food scraps directly with local regenerative farmers as part of our new farmer first program; we provided training and technical support to help farmers use organic discards to make and use compost on eight farms, demonstrating the potential of a distributed community-based compost network that diverts organics from landfills, helps rebuild soils, and supports local food systems.we continued to successfully operate the boulder county recycling center as a model facility for mission-based recycling, while also increasing wages for sorters and equipment operators. Our center for hard-to-recycle materials worked with a growing number of cities and businesses to collect more hard-to-recycle material volumes and types (now up to 27 different materials) and to cultivate creative end market solutions. Our zero waste business & hauling department educated our commercial customers on reducing contamination in recycling and composting, creating a "clean compost" route and demonstrating that quality compost collections are possible with concerted education. Eco-cycle added a second electric truck for recycling collections to our fleet as part of our effort to demonstrate the efficacy of clean transportation options in the waste industry. We also evolved our polybag collection project from a successful pearl street mall pilot to a growing partnership with ecoenclose to scale up retail polybag collections and transportation to a remanufacturer to pursue circular bag-to-bag recycling. Eco-cycle incorporated equity into our work by continuing to raise the wage floor for the least-paid employees in the organization and expanding our board of directors to become a more representative and inclusive organization. We continued to integrate equity arguments about impacts of plastic production and disposal, chemical recycling, and landfill pollution on frontline communities into our campaign materials and worked in coalition with green latinos and other equity leaders to push for updated Colorado landfill methane regulations. Eco-cycle increased education programming and services at nine title 1 schools
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 85% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 85
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 86
- Sustainability: 30
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 91.9%; rating input score 92
- Program expense ratio: 89.6%; rating input score 90
- Fundraising efficiency: $9.61 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -2.4%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.77; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.15; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.7%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.7% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 91.9% of revenue deployed · 89.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $10.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $145K · 20 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $3.2M reported
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 37/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 22/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 38/100.