Ecmc Education Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 472237488
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2018
- Location
- Minneapolis, MN, USA
- Phone
- 6512210566
- Rating
- 48
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Higher Education Institutions
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $14,039,865
- Expenses
- $4,551,007
- Assets
- $2,944,520
- Liabilities
- $16,115,435
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DANIEL FISHER (PRESIDENT & CEO, ECMC GROUP)
- JEREMY WHEATON (FORMER PRESIDENT & CEO, ECMC GROUP)
Highest reported compensation
- DANIEL FISHER (PRESIDENT & CEO, ECMC GROUP): $1,503,752 total reported compensation
- MARTIN SCANLON (CFO & TREASURER): $1,011,175 total reported compensation
- BRIAN BOARDMAN (GENERAL COUNSEL & CORP SECRETARY): $612,291 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Ecmc education, inc.'s mission is to transform career and technical education to provide aspiring and current learners with skills to elevate their careers and communities.
What it reported doing in 2024
Instruction and student services: ecmc education offered career and technical education opportunities with an emphasis in allied health and trades. On march 31, 2022, a plan for liquidation for ecmc education, inc. And all three of its altierus schools was approved by the ecmc group, inc. Board of directors. The teach-outs were completed during 2023 with related expenses being settled through 2027. Ecmc education, inc. No longer enrolls any students as of december 31, 2023. The change is part of ecmc group, inc.'s plan to concentrate primarily on its educational credit management corporation guarantor-related activities, ecmc foundation and education impact investing.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Affiliate-supported. 69% of the money available for current operations came from contributions from related organizations.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 7
- Transparency & Controls: 81
- Accountability: 94
- Sustainability: 52
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 4.2%; rating input score 4
- Program expense ratio: 12.8%; rating input score 13
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 67.6%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.65; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 5.47; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 23.1%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -24.4% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -19.2% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -23.1% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 4.2% of revenue deployed · 12.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 9 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $583K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.5M · 16 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $1.9M reported
- Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 36 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 4/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 13/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.