Echn Wellness Services Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 061360082
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2010
- Forms available
- Form 990 2010
- Location
- South Windsor, CT, USA
- Phone
- 8606461222
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Health Treatment Facilities, Primarily Outpatient
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,162,102
- Expenses
- $992,124
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
23 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To assist women in maintaining their health and well-being, by providing access to a variety of wellness services.
What it reported doing in 2010
Echn wellness services, inc is a not-for-profit organization whose principal activity is the operation of the womens center for wellness. The centers present activities involve providing service, on an out-patient basis, to women to assist them in taking control of their health and personal needs. Echn wellness services is a subsidiary of eastern Connecticut health network, inc., which was formed in 1995 by a merger of mmh corp. And rockville area health services, inc. Echn was organized to provide a broader health care system for the surrounding communities with quality medical care at a reasonable cost and to foster an environment conducive to health and well being whether in the home or in the community.womens center for wellness offers mammography (routine screenings and diagnostic), bone density studies, massage therapy, acupuncture, guided imagery and other complementary therapy. A resource library is available and is free to the public. This library offers a variety of self-help books on various topics such as stress, grief, weight-management, menopause, divorce, etc.expenses related to services performed for patients of womens center for wellness contribute importantly to its exempt purpose because the expenses are incurred in the day-to-day operation of the center and are directly related to the number of patients who visit the center.womens center for wellness provided services to the community regardless of any individuals ability to pay. The center extended charity care through health classic funds in the amount of $1,334, for 14 applicants. For fy11, there were a total of eight thousand nine hundred thirty one(8,931) outpatient visits recorded.the primary service provided by the womens center for wellness is mammography, both screening and diagnostic. In fy11, there were 4,954 screening mammograms, and 1,045 diagnostic mammograms, for a total of 5,999 mammograms or 67.17% of total visits for the center. Gross revenue for mammograms was $1,247,755. Mammogram gross revenue for medicare was $338,833 (27.2%), for medicaid was $19,609 (1.6%), and for grants was $56,369 (4.5%). Allocated expenses to mammography total $483,387 or 71.6% of total program expenses.next largest service is bone density testing. Bone density visits totaled 1,360 for fy11 or 15.2% of total visits of the center. Gross revenue for bone density for fy11 was $322,770. Gross revenue for medicare was $134,751 and medicaid was $5,741. Allocated expenses to bone density total $129,317 for fy11 or 19.2% of total program expenses.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 96% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 95
- Accountability: 81
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 14.6%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 48.4%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -31.4% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -200% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 8 of 12 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $675K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1M · 23 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed
- Consistency: 17 of 17 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2009 to 2010
- Related organizations: 8 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.