Eceyhc Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 463528125
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2018
- Forms available
- Form 990 2018
- Location
- Wake Forest, NC, USA
- Phone
- 8053385656
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Amateur Sports
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $861,961
- Expenses
- $869,295
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- FRANK MORGAN (PRESIDENT)
- ADAM HOOVER (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- JOCELYN LANGLOIS (DIRECTOR OF YOUTH HOCKEY O): $70,385 total reported compensation
- LINCOLN FLAGG (DIRECTOR OF COACHES): $5,475 total reported compensation
- FRANK MORGAN (PRESIDENT): $2,305 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Carolina eagles hockey organization provides a competitive environment of the highest quality for youth ice hockey players. The program focuses on the long-term growth and development of each player and promoting their love for the game.emphasis is placed on education, commitment, goal setting, determination, hard work, leadership and sportsmanship. It is our commitment to nurture the emotional and physical well-being of all our players as they strive to achieve their goals on and off the ice. "it's all about the kids"
What it reported doing in 2018
Conducted 15 youth hockey teams ranging in age from age 8-18 which offered youth clinics & camps aimed to promote health and maturity while providing a competitive environment of the highest quality for youth hockey players in the triangle area.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and the required major-donor schedule is missing or incomplete.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 81
- Transparency & Controls: 75
- Accountability: 58
- Sustainability: 20
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 91.4%; rating input score 91
- Program expense ratio: 89.7%; rating input score 90
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: No; rating input score 0
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 83.3%; rating input score 83; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 22
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.9%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 9.1%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 15.9% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 16.4% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -7.7% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 91.4% of revenue deployed · 89.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 6 board members independent · 2 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $779K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $70K · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2014 to 2018
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 8 not reported.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Major donor itemization scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 33/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 39/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.