Eccrgroup Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 473231771
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2018–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2023
- Location
- E Stroudsburg, PA, USA
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Student Services, Organizations of Students
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $141,440
- Expenses
- $158,805
- Assets
- $69,733
- Liabilities
- $294,110
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Eugene Campbell (Executive Director & CEO)
People named in this filing
- Eugene Campbell (Executive Director & CEO)
- Debby Simon (Treasurer)
- Siobhan Matthes (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The ECCRGroup mission is to strengthen organizations service delivery and systems. By working with senior staff and board members to create strategic plan that addresses long term structural challenges
What it reported doing in 2023
Business Coaching Program The ECCR Small Business Foundations Program provide rural underserved and minority small business entrepreneurs with the skills knowledge and training needed to start and grow their businesses support their families and sustain their communities. Our focus is creating inclusive local economies within rural communities by building on local resources and capacities increasing entrepreneurship and encouraging community resilience.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 66% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 66
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 20
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 69.3%; rating input score 69
- Program expense ratio: 61.7%; rating input score 62
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -12.3%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.44; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 4.22; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.6% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -2.4% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 25% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 69.3% of revenue deployed · 61.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $98K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2018 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 14/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 34/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 25/100.