Eastern Pennsylvania Tactical Emergency Medical Service
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 824939248
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Allentown, PA, USA
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Safety Education
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $153,483
- Expenses
- $107,000
- Assets
- $89,649
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Michael Sorrentino (President)
- Shawn Fariello (Vice- President)
People named in this filing
- Michael Sorrentino (President)
- Shawn Fariello (Vice- President)
- David Albertson (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Provide specially trained Tactical Emergency Medical Services Paramedics to local municipal and state law enforcement agencies during high risk and complicated law enforcement incidents. Provide Tactical EMS security details for VIPs including President and Vice President of the United States. Provide Stop the Bleed programs and other medical training for community members hospital staff EMS organizations and government egencies.
What it reported doing in 2025
Tactical Emergency Medical Services - Provided 1,375 hours of operation at law enforcement activities within the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Activities included High-Risk Warrant services barricaded subjects often with guns or hostages felony terrain searches in austere environments critical security details including the President and Vice President of the United States. During every incident the community in which we are operating is at risk and we are trained and equipped to mitigate those risks to the citizens of those communities. We provide emergency medical services during these incidents to the subjects involved and members of the community as needed.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 85% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 62
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 30.3%; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.84; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -2.8% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 70% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 53/100.