Eastern New York Chapter the American Institute of Architects Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
141600405
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Albany, NY, USA
Phone
5184493334
Rating confidence
Limited

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$59,045
Expenses
$60,693
Assets
$117,404
Liabilities
$9,409

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CAITLIN DALY (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)
  • MARY KATE YOUNG (PRESIDENT)
  • KELLY MELARAGNO (PRESIDENT - ELECT)
  • JOHN TOBIN (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • CAITLIN DALY (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)
  • ALEXANDRA MESSINA (SECRETARY)
  • KARIN KILGORE-GREEN (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization's primary goals are to provide representation and educational information on matters of interest affecting its members and to promote and strengthen the architectural profession in the eastern section of New York state and to support the missions of both the american institute of architects and the aia of New York state. Each member is also a member of the state and national association of architects.

What it reported doing in 2024

The organization provides a series of educational events for both members and non-members. These events are held at various dates throughout the year and are designed to accomplish required educational accreditation requirements and a general knowledge of the architectural profession.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 46
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -2.8%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.93; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.08; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 0.3% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.4% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 39/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 19/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.