East Valley Partnership Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 860500306
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Mesa, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 4803635033
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $512,358
- Expenses
- $515,508
- Assets
- $249,881
- Liabilities
- $6,868
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
118 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOHN LEWIS (PRESIDENT/CEO)
- MIKE HUTCHINSON (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- JOHN LEWIS (PRESIDENT/CEO): $115,360 total reported compensation
- MIKE HUTCHINSON (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT): $103,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The east valley partnership is a regional coalition of community, business, educational, and government leaders whose goal is to provide leadership and support in specific areas of focus, thereby improving business and quality of life in the region.
What it reported doing in 2024
One of our major activities is the development of a legislative advocacy program for state issues that impact the members and the east valley. We have organized a highly inclusive process to develop a list of priorities and projects that can be shared with state and federal officials. Another important task is the ongoing participation of the partnership's staff and board members in a number of ad hoc committees. These committees are often charged with developing solutions to complex regional issues such as infrastructure and transportation funding. The partnership continues to serve the vital role of actively participating and occasionally facilitating these meetings. Two ongoing committees of note are the east valley education think tank and the statewide transportation partners committee. Another ongoing activity is to provide up to date demographic information about the region. Each year, an economic profile document is produced that contains demographic data and other relevant information about the region. Finally, the partnership has a standing marketing committee. We continue to help support and collaborate with many economic development organizations as to market the east valley region to new businesses throughout the united states.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 89
- Sustainability: 30
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 98.8%; rating input score 99; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.6%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.48; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 42.4%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -0.9% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 85 of 86 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $115K · 118 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 34/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 59/100.