East Valley Community Health Center

Legal name: East Valley Community Health Center Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
237068586
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
West Covina, CA, United States
Phone
(626) 919-4333
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$51,020,724
Expenses
$46,623,397
Assets
$38,445,451
Liabilities
$22,235,958

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

18 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ALICIA MARDINI (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)

Highest reported compensation

  • CHINHNAM HATHUC (CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER): $431,341 total reported compensation
  • ALICIA MARDINI (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $409,108 total reported compensation
  • BENEDICTA OMOKO (PHYSICIAN): $333,405 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide access to excellent health care while engaging and empowering our patients, employees, and partners to improve their well-being and the health of our communities.

What it reported doing in 2024

East valley community health center (evchc) is designated as a federally qualified health center. Evchc operates eight sites in west covina, pomona, covina, el monte, and la puente. Health care provided at evchc includes: family medicine, pediatrics, pre and post-natal care, women's health care, including family planning and cancer prevention, HIV/AIDS comprehensive care, dental care, vision care and mental health care. Evchc provided services to 31,744 patients who received over 140,000 visits (in-person and virtual). Nutrition, care coordination and care management are an integral part of our chronic disease management services. Pharmacy services are available at all of our health centers. Evchc outreach education services focus on prevention and testing of HIV for various at-risk populations.we continue to serve the homeless population on the street and homeless shelters. Our team of enrollment specialists provide enrollment assistance at each of our sites.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 71% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 81
  • Transparency & Controls: 74
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 47
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 77.4%; rating input score 77
  • Program expense ratio: 84.6%; rating input score 85
  • Fundraising efficiency: $279.75 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 8.6%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.82; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.58; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 5.7%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 10.2% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 9.7% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.5% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 11 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 3 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: 77.4% of revenue deployed · 84.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $39.5M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $431K · 18 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $2M reported
  • Consistency: 38 of 38 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 33/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 30/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.