East Side Arts Council

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
411702777
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
St Paul, MN, USA
Phone
6517745422
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Performing Arts Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$210,818
Expenses
$223,395
Assets
$290,884
Liabilities
$1,826

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CARLINE BENGTSSON (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • SARAH FEHR (EXECUTIVE DIR.): $40,810 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of the east side arts council is to collaborate with our community and artists to celebrate and experience the arts.

What it reported doing in 2025

When you give people the opportunity to express themselves, it creates a sense of connection and belonging. We believe that when communities know and understand each other, we all benefit. Half of saint paul's population lives on the east side, which boasts a variety of cultures. Coming from different backgrounds can sometimes present challenges, but we believe diversity is our community's greatest strength.east side arts council uses art to bridge cultural gaps and strengthen communities through a wide range of visual and performing arts opportunities that reflect our multicultural populations. Our programs and partnerships allow the diverse population of the east side to share and celebrate culture, offering a sense of belonging and purpose. We exist to address shortcomings on the east side, from a lack of funding for art programs in schools to the isolation some seniors experience in retirement communities.east side arts council uses art to bridge cultural gaps and strengthen communities through a wide range of visual and performing arts opportunities that reflect our multicultural populations. Our programs and partnerships allow the diverse population of the east side to share and celebrate culture, offering a sense of belonging and purpose. We exist to address shortcomings on the east side, from a lack of funding for art programs in schools to the isolation some seniors experience in retirement communities. Our youth programs included artmobile which brought free arts classes to twelve community sites in the summer of 2025. Our teaching artists taught after school classes in visual and performing arts through our partnership with 10 saint paul public schools. During school artist residencies also occurred at 4 inner city schools on the east side. We also provided artists to teach free weekly youth arts classes at 10 sites through our partnership with saint paul parks and recreation for summer blast. We reached 8,438 youth with these programs.creative connections for seniors 62+ is our program that brings free and accessible art to community spaces on the east side for senior citizens. In 2024, this included artist-taught classes in visual arts, poetry and storytelling which took place at arlington hills community center, cambric senior apartments, and labor plaza. Our urban design program partners with artists to bring public art and creative placemaking to the east side which included an art bench addition to our triangle park in railroad island in 2025. Saint paul port authority also partnered with us to create public art for the outside of the new police training center

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 88% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 82
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 69
  • Sustainability: 33
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 88.3%; rating input score 88
  • Program expense ratio: 83.3%; rating input score 83
  • Fundraising efficiency: $14.68 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -6%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.3; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 18.3%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -3.1% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -3% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.6% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 88.3% of revenue deployed · 83.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 2 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $186K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $41K · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2011 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 7 not reported.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 47/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 24/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 48/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 20/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 43/100.