East River Pop Warner Football League Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
391843558
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2020
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2020
Location
De Pere, WI, USA
Phone
9202174483
Rating confidence
Limited

Reported finances

Revenue
$-2,870
Expenses
$14,666
Assets
$12,453
Liabilities
$500

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JIMMY REIFFERS (PRESIDENT)
  • JOE WAITER (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JIMMY REIFFERS (PRESIDENT)
  • JOE WAITER (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • HEATHER REIFFERS (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

East river pop warner is a youth athletic program with an emphasis on fundamentals, teamwork, sportsmanship, and academic excellence in tackle football.

What it reported doing in 2020

East river pop warner football is green bay's premier youth football league. Children between the ages of 7 and 11 are taught safe tackling and football fundamentals under the direction of volunteer coaches who are USA football certified. The program emphasizes safety, sportsmanship, teamwork and love of the game all kids play in every game. Additionally, pop warner is the only national youth sports organization in america that rewards its members for their outstanding performance in the classroom via its little scholars program.

Operating model

Revenue model
No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 48
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 21
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 47.9%; rating input score 48

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -611%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.85; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -13.7% per year; rating input score 0; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -8.2% per year; rating input score 0; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -13.3% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 47.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $7K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2010 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 48/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 29/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.