East Haven Public Library Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 060699247
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- East Haven, CT, USA
- Phone
- 2034683890
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Libraries
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $994,913
- Expenses
- $964,890
- Assets
- $795,306
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- Sarah Mallory (Library Director): $71,741 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Hagaman Memorial Library is the center for community enrichment and as such it seeks to provide information, resources, and programs for lifelong learning as well as to improve the quality of life of East Haven residents by providing a top notch collection of materials in multiple formats, current technology, and cultural opportunities.
What it reported doing in 2024
One of the most vital services the library offers is access to free programming. The Library provided a total of 623 in-person, on-site programs this year with attendance of 5,439. In addition to on-site programs, library staff partnered with other organizations in the community throughout the year to provide off-site programming and outreach; these off-site partnerships were further increased during the building closure. In total, the library provided 101 off-site programs, interacting with 1,635 members of the community. This represents a 201 percent increase over our outreach interactions in the previous fiscal year, and represents strong and growing relationships with our community partners, who provided vital support during this difficult time. The library also continued to offer virtual programs this year. This included 31 live viewing events and 20 prerecorded events. Total participation in these programs was 3,374. Finally, the library also offered opportunities for members of the community to participate in asynchronous programsself-directed activities available on your own schedule. The library offered 51 of these self-directed events during the year, with participation of 1,631. Total program participation for the year was 12,079.In addition to the multitude of library sponsored events above, the library also offered a community meeting space for 512 meetings of outside organizations, with outside group attendance of 6,181. Highlights for Library Programming: 1. Children's Programming: a. One highlight this fiscal year was the addition of a new Youth Services Librarian to our team, revitalizing programs with new ideas and a new skillset. b. Our strong early literacy program continued to thrive and grow under this new leadership. New programs for toddlers are in development, with additional musical events provided by Rob Messore and new innovations, like our "Toddler & Tots Bubble Ball" drawing in new families. We saw an increase in attendance for this age group during our new Toddler Tuesday programs. Similarly, our weekly Craft and Storytime program also saw an increase in attendance.c. The last quarter of the fiscal year saw significant changes following the closure of the building, as we adapted the majority of our youth programming to proceed off-site. Flexibility and fast thinking are key requirements to running youth events, and this was a chance to implement these skills.d. Collaboration withand outreach withinthe community were also essential to the library's success this year, particularly during youth services events. Many groups within the community, such as the town's Family Resource Center, local churches and schools, and the town's Community Dining Room provided us with venues for hosting programs. They also offered additional support during programs, providing an opportunity to collaborate in new ways. Many of these outreach opportunities were highly successful, and saw great attendance numbers. For more information on Children's Services, see the page at: https://www.hagamanlibrary.org/category/kids/2. Teen Programming: a. We saw significant success with recurring programs for teen audiences, which drew teens to return to the library month after month. These recurring programs included our Tabletop Club, which provides teens an opportunity to learn and play games that require creativity, writing, fast thinking, and social deduction; Anime Club; and Teen Crafternoon, which focused on a different skill each month. Tabletop Club especially has continued to see a regular group of attendees, even after a change in venue due to the closure of the building from April through the end of the fiscal year.b. Another highlight is our ongoing success with asynchronous programs. Offering take-and-make kits and other programs that can be completed on teen's own schedules has shown to be an excellent way to reach them and provide activities for this age group, especially those who may otherwise be unable to attend p
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 91% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 74
- Transparency & Controls: 83
- Accountability: 79
- Sustainability: 48
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 82.2%; rating input score 82
- Program expense ratio: 84.7%; rating input score 85
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 3%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.82; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.4%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -0.5% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -2.1% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.3% per year; rating input score 100; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 82.2% of revenue deployed · 84.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $817K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $72K · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 20 of 21 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 45/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 45/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.