Earth Inbalance Corporation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
922721588
IRS 990 coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Orlando, FL, USA
Phone
2397895338
Rating
64
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Natural Resources Conservation and Protection

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,682,480
Expenses
$331,911
Assets
$2,422,925
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ROCHELLE JAMES (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • ROCHELLE JAMES (PRESIDENT): $103,833 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Exlusively to education, conservation, charity, sustainability, prevention of cruelty to children and wildlife, humanitarian and other charitable purpose as encumerated by 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code.

What it reported doing in 2024

Program service accomplishments (2024): in 2024, the organization operated a single, integrated program aligning public education, environmental conservation, and digital equity. Activities focused on planning, stakeholder engagement, and humanitarian support to lay the groundwork for responsible implementation in subsequent years (no facilities or training cohorts were launched in 2024).objective a regenerative digital infrastructure (technology & siting framework) activities: met with industry stakeholders, educators, and prospective funders to stress-test a practical framework for data and connectivity projects; drafted siting and design guidelines favoring cleaner power use and site restoration; outlined community-benefit practices (local hiring, workforce training, transparency); and sketched workforce pathways to help residents access future jobs. Outputs (2024): stakeholder consultations completed; draft siting/design guidelines prepared; community-benefit practices documented; preliminary workforce pathway outlines produced.objective b community education & humanitarian support activities: provided direct humanitarian assistance and educational resources to underserved communities; developed plans for community education initiatives focused on women's empowerment, digital literacy, and microenterprise. Planning included needs assessments, curriculum design, instructor training outlines, and operational plans for solar-powered learning hubs and safe study spaces. Outputs (2024): essential aid (food, water, clothing, educational resources) delivered to 65 orphaned children in bangladesh refugee camps; draft curricula and training outlines completed; site and operations plans for future learning hubs prepared.objective c environmental conservation & protection activities: advanced planning for wildlife corridor restoration and human-wildlife conflict mitigation in bangladesh, including ecological scoping, draft designs for low-impact fencing and early-warning approaches, stakeholder consultations, and development of monitoring plans and baseline metrics. Outputs (2024): corridor restoration scoping completed; preliminary fencing and early-warning designs drafted; community stewardship materials outlined; baseline monitoring and metrics framework prepared.summary: these 2024 activities furthered the organization's charitable and educational mission by building a practical, community-aligned pathway that integrates sustainable infrastructure, humanitarian support, and environmental protection for future implementation.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 97% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 45% for direct work, and 55% for grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 35
  • Transparency & Controls: 89
  • Accountability: 69
  • Sustainability: 88
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 11.1%; rating input score 11
  • Program expense ratio: 88.2%; rating input score 88
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 87.6%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.3; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 7.5%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 68.7% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 163.9% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 173.7% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 11.1% of revenue deployed · 88.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 2 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $293K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $104K · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 19 of 20 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 11/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 7 not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 39/100.