Earth Day Coalition
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 341667267
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2018
- Forms available
- Form 990 2018
- Location
- Cleveland, OH, USA
- Phone
- 4407732158
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Environmental Quality, Protection, and Beautification N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $9,140
- Expenses
- $16,246
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $8,283
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BRENDA O'REILLY (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- DEVO BAVISHI (DIRECTOR)
- HENRY BOEPPLE (DIRECTOR)
- ALLAN DREYER (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Earth day coalition (edc) is a nonprofit environmental education and advocacy organization serving northeast Ohio and the nation. Edc was established in 1990 to commemorate the twentieth anniversary of earth day in Ohio. The mission of earth day coalition is to provide education, inspire leadership and encourage action for a healthy environment.
What it reported doing in 2018
Clean transportation: designated in 1999 as the u.s. Department of energy clean cities coalition serving northeast Ohio (8 counties), earth day coalition's clean transportation program has the focused and measured goal of reducing petroleum consumption in transportation (gasoline and diesel) and improving air quality for our region. As one of 90 similar sponsored coalitions across the country, we report back to the u.s. Doe on our progress with key metric's. Transportation accounts for 30% of greenhouse gas emissions which contribute to climate change in the u.s. Our program aggressively takes on this issue at the local level through a broad partnership of stakeholders which includes business, municipal, and other institutional fleets, as well as individuals. We educate fleet managers with a three-tiered approach involving alternative fuels, advanced technologies, and practices that reduce our consumption of petroleum in transportation (such as idle reduction ordinances, ride sharing, mass transit, and bicycle and pedestrian friendly development practices). We assist fleet managers in securing funding and taking advantage of federal, state, and local incentives, and provide year-round educational forums, workshops, and ride and drive events to increase the adoption of more sustainable transportation solutions. We partnered with sustainable cleveland in their annual conference, and at our earthfest, to host ride and drive events which exposed thousands of people to new vehicle technologies. We also launched our electric vehicle deployment task force with a host of local stakeholders looking to expedite the adoption of electric vehicles and increase the number of local charging stations in our area. Our clean transportation program increases national energy security through the adoption of cleaner domestic fuels, creates local manufacturing jobs, and improves our local economy. It achieves this while also improving our air quality, decreasing our reliance on petroleum imports from outside the u.s., and has a significant impact on the reduction of greenhouse gases that pose a threat to the well-being of future generations.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 67% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 87
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 70
- Sustainability: 18
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 95.1%; rating input score 95
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -77.7%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -20% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -14.9% per year; rating input score 0; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -26.5% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 95.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $15K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 22 of 22 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2012 to 2018
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 22/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.