Earth Advocacy Institute Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
852651636
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Washington, DC, USA
Phone
4153057300
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Alliance/Advocacy Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,026
Expenses
$33,196
Assets
$49,809

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

People named in this filing

  • ANDREW KIMBRELL (Chairman)
  • RANDY HAYES (TREAS. & SEC.)
  • TONJA MOORE (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Earth citizenship programs

What it reported doing in 2024

Developed and shopped a fundraising proposal for this new NGO to work on championing paradigm shift mapping, earth citizenship programs, a nd building a lobal coalition on the shift from industrial agriculture to ecological farming via agroecology. Convened a zoom kickoff with major leaders from around the world to establish a new coalition entitled: international alliance for climate and agriculture (iaca). Attended (a team of five people) the united nations annual climate change meeting (cop 27) in sharm el sheik, egypt.o applied for conducted two well attended side events in the cop 27 blue zone and one well attended panel in the green zone.o working with the center for food safety, we held a webinar reporting on cop 27 work. Hand in hand with sister group, foundation earth, we researched partners on a continental network of bioregional economies and are working with the buckminster fuller institute in California on a funding proposal.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 76
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 24
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 35.7%; rating input score 36

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1,538.5%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.5; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -108.4% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 122.2% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -47.7% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 35.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $12K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 36/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 58/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.