Early Years
Legal name: Early Years Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 561514058
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Chapel Hill, NC, US
- Phone
- 919-967-3272
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $42,200,134
- Expenses
- $41,599,725
- Assets
- $12,531,920
- Liabilities
- $3,690,163
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
22 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KRISTI SNUGGS (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- KRISTI SNUGGS (PRESIDENT): $191,382 total reported compensation
- EMMANUEL PAUL (CHIEF BUSINESS SERVICES OF): $140,488 total reported compensation
- EDITH LOCKE (SR VP PROFESSIONAL DEV INI): $139,712 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
A Comprehensive Approach to Enhancing Early Care and Education
What it reported doing in 2024
Federal, state & local initiatives:100% of regional lead ccr&r agencies indicated that assistance received from the r&r council was helpful and indicated that the ccr&r council has enabled the improvement of r&r services. All 14 regional lead agencies successfully implemented the following three ccr&r core services: consumer education and referral, professional development and technical assistance. The birth-to-three quality initiative achieved 107% of its three year (fy23-fy25) goal of reaching 700 statewide practice based coaching participants by providing 234 individuals pbc in fy23, 250 individuals pbc in fy24, and 265 individuals in fy25. Under the b-3 quality initiative, 2394 child care providers participated in training sessions representing 120% of the established goal of 2000 participants for fy 25. Under the statewide core services during fy25, 94% of parents responding to follow-up surveys indicated that they chose 3, 4, or 5 star care. Eight of the 14 regions reported that at least 89% of the customers surveyed responded that they chose 3, 4, or 5 star care, with seven of 14 reporting that at least 97% of parents indicated they choose this level of care. Statewide 89% of parents responding to follow-up surveys during fy25 indicated that they used quality indicators in their search for care. Nine of 14 regions reported that at least 90% of the customers surveyed responded that they used quality indicators in their child care search. Statistical data from dcdee indicates that 74% of all children enrolled in licensed care in the state of North Carolina were enrolled in 4- and 5- star care. This is a significant percentage of the state's children in higher quality care. Furthermore, at the conclusion of fy25, only 4% of children enrolled in licensed child care in North Carolina remain enrolled in 1- or 2-star care.child and adult care food program (cacfp): early years serves as a sponsor for cacfp, a federally-funded program which provides financial reimbursement, training and technical assistance to child care institutions for the provision of nutritious foods for children in their care. - cacfp served 36 child care homes in the triangle area. - there were 133,028 nutritious meals and snacks served this year meeting the usda meal patterns to an average of 226 children per month from diverse populations. - there were 99 monitoring visits made to child care programs to review records, observe meals and provide technical assistance as needed.technical assistance and professional development and support services: - the technical assistance team members provided support, coaching, and educational resources to 667 early childhood teachers serving a total of 1273 children from birth to age 5. - there were 225 professional development workshops conducted for 1,733 (unduplicated) 3,149 (duplicated) child care professionals in the triangle area. - there were 471 in-service hours received by the attendees. - there were 55 early educators trained in ceu topics completing a total of 630 continuing education hours (ceus)/67.5 in-service credit hours. - 95% of educators attending workshops reported feeling confident in their ability to apply the knowledge and skills gained through training.child care program scholarship services: all durham county smart start contracted scholarship funds were fully utilized, for a total of $2,821,710.00. - scholarships supported 626 children in child care facilities with an average star rating of 4.8, and 90% of children were enrolled in 5-star licensed facilities. - 392 children were jointly funded through the durham county nc prek program. - 1 children received scholarships through the early head start set-aside fund. - 0 children receiving services had documented developmental needs. - 26% of children lived in families where spanish was reported as the primary language. $29,496.85 was provided through the orange county scholarship program, supporting five children attending 5-star child care faci
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 80% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 73% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 92
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 36
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 92.2%; rating input score 92
- Program expense ratio: 93.5%; rating input score 93
- Fundraising efficiency: $386.19 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.4%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.3; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.29; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.8%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.9% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.7% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.1% per year; rating input score 100; 24th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 12 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 92.2% of revenue deployed · 93.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $38.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $191K · 22 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $3.6M reported
- Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 108 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 103 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 40/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 8/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 47/100.