Early Childhood Academy Public Charter School
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 260088232
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 2023730035
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Charter Schools
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $9,961,192
- Expenses
- $8,926,315
- Assets
- $27,839,803
- Liabilities
- $17,799,487
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DENNIS SAWYERS (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- WENDY EDWARDS (EXECUTIVE DI): $231,816 total reported compensation
- THANN INGRAHAM - DEPUTY (EXECUTIVE DI): $183,695 total reported compensation
- PAMELA FAULCON (PRINCIPAL): $157,949 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
It is the mission of early childhood academy public charter school to foster the academic and social/emotional growth and development of each student in a safe and holistic learning environment that will equip all students with the knowledge and tools to become high achievers, proficient readers, and critical thinkers who will thrive for a lifetime as productive and caring citizens.
What it reported doing in 2024
Educational approach eca has a strong curricular focus on language and literacy, given the tremendous impact of early language development on nearly all other aspects of academic growth. Instruction is based on the early learning standards for prekindergarten and on the english language arts and math common core state standards for kindergarten through grade three. Early childhood academy public charter school has selected the appletree institute for education innovations every child ready program as its instructional tool for pre-kindergarten and the hmh into reading, into math, and into science programs for kindergarten to grade three. Social studies instruction is provided based on the district of columbia social studies standards. Every child ready is an evidence-based, comprehensive, preschool instructional model that drives what to teach, how to teach, and how to tell children are learning. Every child ready is currently implemented in 4 states or districts across the u.s. Appletree institute implements a research-to-practice model to inform revisions to the model to support children, teachers and leaders. Hmh into reading instruction is implemented in accordance with the evidence-based science of reading research. It is differentiated by design to offer literacy instruction, support teachers in developing a culture of learning and growth, and help all learners believe in the power of "i can." hmh supports teachers in transitioning students beyond explicit instruction and into self-actualized learning. Hmh into math uses an approach focused on a growth mindset for students and real feedback from teachers to drive growth for each learner. Hmh into science delivers a manageable, streamlined, engaging curriculum that combines hands-on learning with ela-based science instruction. The district of columbia social studies standards for kindergarten through grade 3 include focus on myself and my community, working and building together, this wide world, and geography, history, and cultures of the district of columbia. The standards provide students with a personal connection to social studies learning. Assessment eca believes that the purpose of assessment is to inform instruction and assess student progress. Through implementation of a variety of formal and informal assessments, teachers obtain useful information about each childs knowledge, skills, and progress by observing, documenting, analyzing, and reviewing work samples over time. Teachers at early childhood academy public charter school meet in professional learning communities weekly, to analyze data and use it to inform instructional planning. Baseline and benchmark formative and summative assessments for prekindergarten include the every child ready assessment provided by the appletree institute for education innovation. Prekindergarten classroom environments are also evaluated using the classroom assessment scoring system (class). Formative and summative assessments for kindergarten through grade three students are administered using the northwest evaluation association measures of academic progress (nwea map)and the dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills (dibels). In the spring, third grade students also complete the dc comprehensive assessments of progress in education (cape), which is the required statewide assessment. Data from these assessments inform planning and instruction for all students and serve as a critical part of the schools evaluation of its educational programs. Discipline eca seeks to create and maintain a learning environment that is nurturing, child-centered, and culturally sensitive through the use of the district of columbia standards for social/emotional learning (dc sel). The dc sel includes essential social and emotional knowledge and skills, including how to manage emotions, achieve goals, maintain supportive relationships and make responsible and caring decisions. Dc sel provides teachers with strategies that enable them to de-e
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 90% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 81
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 89
- Sustainability: 56
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 79.6%; rating input score 80
- Program expense ratio: 90.6%; rating input score 91
- Fundraising efficiency: $15.82 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 10.4%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.12; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.64; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 12.2%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.8% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.1% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 15.9% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 79.6% of revenue deployed · 90.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 9 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $8.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $232K · 15 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $877K reported
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 52/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 15/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 24/100.