Eagles Nest Ranch

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
264161234
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2015
Location
Elizabeth, CO, USA
Phone
3035962784
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$140,510
Expenses
$141,552
Assets
$79,060

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

People named in this filing

  • SUZAN STANFILL (Executive Dir.)
  • ELIZABETH MARTIN (Treasurer)
  • ROBIN THOMPSON (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Eagles Nest Ranch provides the community a place to renew hope, build trust and experience growth from various types of adversity and emotional wounds through their interaction with horses and a loving and welcoming staff. Individual and group sessions take place at a peaceful ranch environment and is provided free of charge. We believe that no matter how dark the day, there is always hope through Gods steadfast love and forgiveness. In 2024 we refined our target population to serving the military and first responder communities exclusively. Additionally, ENR is a place for unwanted, abandoned and neglected horses/equines in the community. These equines will be taken in and cared for through feeding, nourishing, vetting and training in order to find them new loving and caring homes. This very small program is called Horses in Hardship. If appropriate the horses in this program will become part of the session programs so they can then be matched with an individual who has also experienc

What it reported doing in 2025

Healing horses for armed forces see sch o

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 75
  • Sustainability: 33
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -0.7%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.56; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 0.2% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 9.5% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 11.3% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2016 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 28/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 41/100.