Eagleclaw Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
813600372
IRS 990 coverage
2018–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2017, Form 990-N 2016
Location
Seattle, WA, USA
Phone
2062952567
Rating
67
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Soccer

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$853,352
Expenses
$931,393
Assets
$163,632
Liabilities
$198,696

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • JOSEPH M CAMPOS (EXEC. DIR., PRES. & TREAS.): $12,000 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The eagleclaw foundation is a non-profit and educational organization whose mission is to foster the physical, mental and emotional growth and development of youth in the state of Washington through the sport of soccer at all levels of age and competition.

What it reported doing in 2024

The eagleclaw foundation operated two affiliated youth soccer programs under its umbrella, eagleclaw football club and valencia cf academy (seattle). Eagleclaw fc is the top youth soccer club in the greater puget sound region for real talent development. From the youngest ages, players are educated in a possession-based style known as positional play. This is why eagleclaw players are widely acknowledged to be the most technical and intelligent players on the field. Designed to be a comprehensive and holistic player development program, eagleclaw provides an educational and competitive pathway for players beginning from the grass roots to the highest levels of competition. Player development begins with our primary academy, a top quality development program for youth players ages 5-13. Each year these players will compete in the Washington premier league (wpl) and train with experienced coaches following a comprehensive technical and tactical training curriculum created by eagleclaw fc in collaboration with valencia cf. At the early ages of 5-13, eagleclaw fc focuses on providing the best learning environment where players are free to explore their passion for the game and learn in an environment that is focused more on individual player development over team development. A key objective of the primary academy is to prepare players for their eventual tryout for our advanced academy teams. The valencia c.f. Academy seattle is a high-performance soccer program designed to accelerate the development of players with the passion and potential to play soccer at the highest levels of the game. While we hope our players will make the jump to valencia cf in spain and play in la liga, we are confident our players will be prepared to excel at whatever level they ultimately reach. Following the philosophies and methodologies of valencia cf, the academy is focused on education as the key to unlocking real talent development. We educate people and develop footballers.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has grown recently. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 88
  • Transparency & Controls: 50
  • Accountability: 55
  • Sustainability: 18
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 98.3%; rating input score 98
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
  • Grant itemization coverage: Scored; rating input score 0
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -9.1%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.18; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.21; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 1.3%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 13.8% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 13.2% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 98.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 2 of 3 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $916K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $12K · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes foreign activity
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2018 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 18/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 8/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 4/100.