Eagle Sawyer Fire Protection
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 800800717
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Parkers Lake, KY, USA
- Phone
- 6063869363
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fire Prevention
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $49,002
- Expenses
- $46,368
- Assets
- $202,125
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ARCHIE SPRADLIN (PRESIDENT)
- CLIFFORD WARMAN (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- WILLIAM HALE (FIRE CHIEF)
- DAVID SPRADLIN (ASSISTANT CHIEF)
- RUSTY SPRADLIN (DEPUTY CHIEF)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Preventing loss of life and woodland protection through fire and rescue working with ems to serve the eagle sawyer fire district in mccreary county, ky
What it reported doing in 2023
The mission of the eagle sawyer fire protection district is to prvent loss of life and property. In addition to responding to fires we also respond with ems when needed, motor vehicle accidents, rescue calls, and incidents involving hazardous materials. For the fiscal year our calls constituted 34 runs. The volunteers and officers contributed over 6,000 hours to serve the eagle-sawyer fire district in mccreary county, ky. The department purchased a crash truck as well as equip a truck with a skid unit for brush fires.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Assets have declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 97
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 57
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 94.6%; rating input score 95
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 5.4%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.36; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 8.8% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -13.8% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 94.6% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $46K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2022 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 56/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.