Each and Every One Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 274285420
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2022–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Fort Worth, TX, USA
- Phone
- 8173008418
- Rating
- 62
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $95,750
- Expenses
- $147,567
- Assets
- $281,297
- Liabilities
- $538,842
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JAN UNDERWOOD (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- ALISA MAPLES (BOARD MEMBER)
- CARA NEIL (BOARD MEMEBE)
- SARA NEVILLE (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the each and everyone foundation is to advocate and pursue the development of vocational training programs for adults with intellectual differences. Our goal is to give the individual the support needed to pursue meaningful employment within
What it reported doing in 2025
The mingus job accelerator is the main service program of the each and every one foundation. Located in mingus, Texas this setting combines historical roots and repurposing of a 160 old building designed to encourage, guide, and tran aduls with intellectual disaabilities. Within the 2 acre setting are tiny houses, gardens, beneventi's italian restaurant and an independently owned beer, wine, and coffee bar operated by a third party. Also within the project is an animal rescue shelter run by community volunteers.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 96% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 58
- Transparency & Controls: 83
- Accountability: 64
- Sustainability: 29
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 74.8%; rating input score 75
- Program expense ratio: 48.5%; rating input score 49
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -54.1%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.91; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.92; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -19.3% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -19.4% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -4.7% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 74.8% of revenue deployed · 48.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $72K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 20 of 21 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 49/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 24/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule D land buildings reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 58/100.