Dynamic Housing and Community Services Corporation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 851372679
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- Dallas, TX, USA
- Phone
- 2144131534
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Housing Development, Construction, Management
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,538,300
- Expenses
- $3,639,375
- Assets
- $45,380,628
- Liabilities
- $46,481,703
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
18 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TIMOTHY MALLAD (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
- KRISTEN JORDAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR - OAW)
- DUSTIN ALLEN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR - PVN)
Highest reported compensation
- TIMOTHY MALLAD (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $746,485 total reported compensation
- STEVEN AILEY (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $453,831 total reported compensation
- JANELLE BERTOLINO (CHIEF STRATEGY OFFICER): $357,215 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
St. Joseph village, as a member of the forefront living family of non-profit organizations, pledges to make each moment matter for those it serves.
What it reported doing in 2025
St. Joseph village, a member of the forefront living family of non-profit organizations, operates as continuing care retirement community (ccrc) in coppell, Texas.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 97% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 80
- Transparency & Controls: 65
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 32
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 72.9%; rating input score 73
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -43.4%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 12.47; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.02; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.9%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 72.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $746K · 18 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $483K reported
- Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 6 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 41/100.