Dyadic Developmental Psychotherapy Inst C/o Ellie Williams
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 273228715
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2021
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 7173092873
- Rating
- 41
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Professional Societies, Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $377,023
- Expenses
- $228,591
- Assets
- $191,344
- Liabilities
- $494
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MICHELLE HOGETERP (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- MICHELLE HOGETERP (PRESIDENT)
- ELLIE WILLIAMS (TREASURER)
- ANNE BENSON (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To foster, promote and improve the standards of treatment by licensed practitioners for children with problems secondary to abuse, neglect and multiple placements; (b) to improve such standards by certifying licensed practitioners in the provision of dyadic developementenal psychotheropy. The organization will collect dues from its members as well as fees for providing educational training, seminars and workshops to its members. The education will be consistant to the providers needs to maintain, improve, and expand their current job skills provide and deliver professional service and psychological care to their patients.
What it reported doing in 2024
Education and training for practitioners: ddpi provided foundational education and training through its internationally recognised ddp level one and level two courses, as well as practicum supervision programs. These courses are designed to foster, promote, and improve treatment standards among licensed professionals working with children and families impacted by trauma and attachment difficulties. Training was delivered by certified trainers across multiple regions and time zones, both in-person and online.in fy2024, ddpi generated $122,125 in program revenue from these core training activities. Hundreds of clinicians engaged with ddp for the first time, equipping themselves with the tools and relational framework to practice more effectively with children and caregivers in distress.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - Revenue comfortably covers expenses and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 38
- Transparency & Controls: 50
- Accountability: 24
- Sustainability: 66
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 33.8%; rating input score 34
- Program expense ratio: 55.8%; rating input score 56
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
- Grant itemization coverage: Scored; rating input score 0
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 39.4%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.84; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 78.7% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 84.2% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 33.8% of revenue deployed · 55.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 10 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $128K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 16 of 16 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes foreign activity
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 34/100.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 56/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 6 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 36/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 53/100.