Dutchess County 10-13 Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 471600495
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990 2016, Form 990-EZ 2022
- Location
- Hopewell Junction, NY, USA
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $56,232
- Expenses
- $23,125
- Assets
- $106,262
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
People named in this filing
- BRUCE CONEENY (CHAIRPERSON)
- MICHAEL BRITSKY (VICE CHAIRPE)
- LORI DEROSA (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization was formed exclusively for the charitable purpose of aiding members of law enforcement who are suffering through financial hardship due to illness, injury or other unfortunate circumstances. Assistance is given by providing funds and services to deserving candidates throughout the hudson valley.
What it reported doing in 2022
The organization provided financial assistance throughout the year to recipients who met the criteria per the organization's mission statement.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 64% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 63
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 74
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 41.1%; rating input score 41
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 58.9%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.6; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -36.1% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 32.1% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 37.6% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 41.1% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $23K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2020 to 2022
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 41/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.