Dusty Baker International Baseball Academy Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
300638072
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2018
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2018
Location
Lincoln, CA, USA
Phone
9164348802
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Baseball, Softball

Reported finances

Revenue
$17,284
Expenses
$53,099
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOHNNIE B BAKER JR (President)
  • GENE FRESCHETTE (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • JOHNNIE B BAKER JR (President)
  • MELISSA BAKER (EXEC. VICE PRES)
  • GENE FRESCHETTE (Vice President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The specific purpose of this organization is to generate and raise funds, donations and grants through public, private, commercial and special programs, events and activities to support and provide educational and instructional scholarships, fellowships and grants to individuals, private, public and other charitable organizations. These finds are to be distributed and/or contributed to support the financially underprivileged, low income and/or at-risk individuals and groups enabling them to enter and participate in meaningful and career-oriented educational, instructional, technical and recreational knowledge and work skills opportunities.

What it reported doing in 2018

In this tax year the organization provided training in baseball for ages 8 - 19 through professional instruction. We provided college coaches to discuss the importance of education/gpa/citizenship via meetings. Approximately 30% of attendees from financially stressed families were provided scholarships.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 86
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 3
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 64.2%; rating input score 64

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -207.2%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 30%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -13.3% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -20.2% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -24.5% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 64.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $34K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2014 to 2018
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is recorded as not currently operating in California.