DurangoSan Juan Lodge 46 AF and AM
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 840005898
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Durango, CO, USA
- Phone
- 9707491012
- Rating
- 48
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $21,274
- Expenses
- $12,009
- Assets
- $244,664
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
People named in this filing
- Jeffrey Reynolds (Chaplain)
- Shawn Smith (Junior Steward)
- Jon Bower (Junior Deacon)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Making good men better men. The Masons are a group of men that work together to make each other better, doing this through ritual work, study and making a difference in our communities. We are very pro-education, in fact, the Masons were instrumental in setting up schools in the colonies. We assist the Grand Lodge (Head Lodge of each state) in offering their programs on scholarships, vocaional school grants. Locally, we offer scholarships to graduating LaPlata seniors. We have been involved with BBBS of Southwest Colorado, with members mentoring students. We are a 4-H sponsor of their catch-it program for 4-H members. We get involved with other Masonic Family groups like the Shriners, who spend about 2 million a day through a network of hospitals. There are speech programs for the kids, as well as an eye foundation.
What it reported doing in 2024
We provided scholarship funds to LaPlata County seniors.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 73% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 19
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 84
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 29.9%; rating input score 30
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 43.6%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 20.37; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -4.4% per year; rating input score 0; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -7.4% per year; rating input score 0; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 29.9% of revenue deployed
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 30/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.