Duncan Tree Ventures Incorporated

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
261262029
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2010
Location
Rosedale, NY, USA
Phone
6465356423
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
International Relief

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$7,552
Expenses
$3,506
Assets
$126
Liabilities
$32,783

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • OUIDA DUNCAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • OUIDA DUNCAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • SHEILA CAMPBELL-FORRESTER (BOARD MEMBER (INTERIM))
  • DAVID BLUMSTEIN (BOARD MEMBER (INTERIM))

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Duncan tree ventures is organized exclusively for charitable and educational purposes. We provide coaching, mentoring, and life-skills development to youth and underserviced communities, fostering emotional intelligence, resilience, and self-leadership.

What it reported doing in 2024

Core program areas: youth coaching and mentoring programs, workshops and educational events, community partnerships and democratizing coaching accessactivities and impact: we offer evidence-based programs, including group and individual coaching, workshops on leadership and emotional regulation, and community collaborations to expand access. Sliding-scale and sponsored opportunities ensure equitable participation. Our programs improve well-being, academic engagement, and long-term outcomes, helping participants build skills for personal and community growth.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 52
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 53.6%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.04; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 260.18; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -15.4% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -13.2% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 8/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.