Dumbarton Oaks Park Conservancy Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
274197533
IRS 990 coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2011
Location
Washington, DC, USA
Phone
2023333547
Rating
70
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Environmental Beautification and Aesthetics

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$666,137
Expenses
$164,847
Assets
$747,591
Liabilities
$34,280

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LINDSEY MILSTEIN (PRESIDENT & CO-CHAIR)
  • LOU SLADE (1ST VICE PRESIDENT)
  • GEORGE SELTZER (2ND VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • LINDSEY MILSTEIN (PRESIDENT & CO-CHAIR)
  • ELIZABETH GILBERT (TREASURER & CO-CHAIR)
  • LOU SLADE (1ST VICE PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of dumbarton oaks park conservancy (the organization) is to restore, promote, and maintain dumbarton oaks park in partnership with the national park service.

What it reported doing in 2024

Preservation and restoration: the mission of dumbarton oaks park conservancy (dopc) is to restore, promote and maintain dumbarton oaks park now and for future generations. A 35 acre pastoral oasis in the middle of georgetown, dumbarton oaks park is the woodland and meadow portion of mildred and robert wood bliss original 53-acre dumbarton oaks estate.(continued on schedule o)(continued from page 2, preservation and restoration)one of the finest garden designs in american landscape history, it is the master work of beatrix farrand, america's first woman landscape architect. Farrand's 1921 landscape design created a progression from formal garden rooms near the main house to less formal areas down the hillside, before flowing into a naturalistic woodland garden in the stream valley. This "wild" portion of the estate is a highly designed composition of meadows, woods, and stream, with waterfalls, bridges, and a reflecting pond defining the landscape. In 1940, the blisses donated the naturalistic portion of the garden to the american people as a public park, overseen today by the national park service (nps) as dumbarton oaks park. The park is emerging from environmental crisis after fourteen years of dumbarton oaks park conservancy's dedication to its restoration and conservation. This work includes the removal of invasive plants that overrun the woods and meadows, repairing and protecting crumbling stonework, and addressing stormwater runoff into the valley that erodes the hillsides, undermines the historically significant trees, silts up the stream and ponds and undercuts the decorative waterfalls. Dopc, in partnership with nps, is tackling these significant and costly challenges.dopc performs this work through a public-private partnership with nps entered into pursuant to a memorandum of understanding signed in 2011, and followed by a 2016 master cooperative agreement and a 2016 friends group agreement, along with mutually agreed upon annual work plans. The friends group agreement is currently being updated to a new philanthropic partnership agreement. The annual work plans are guided by a 1997 landscape preservation maintenance plan and a cultural landscape report part i and part ii, all written expressly for the restoration of dumbarton oaks park.the restoration and maintenance of dumbarton oaks park is entirely funded by dopc's work to engage donors, seek grants, facilitate volunteer engagement, and the donation of in-kind services. The tools used by dopc and the nps are community engagement, the development of a robust volunteer corps, and the implementation of a successful environmental education program.in 2024, the breadth of the preservation and restoration projects initiated, funded, and completed are the following:- stream valley project, phase iii complete with thousands of native plants, in various formats (seed, plug, container, root ball) successfully installed. The svp is now under an ongoing maintenance detail. This project is funded by the national park foundation and individual donors who are change makers showcasing the power of public-private partnership to save a landscape that hasn't received priority treatment or funding and yet is one of the greatest landscape designs of the 20th century. - wayside and wayfinding signage master plan for dumbarton oaks park entrances are in the planning phase. One new sign has been installed thus far and is located at the top of lovers lane r st entrance. It was funded by a grant from the daughters of the american revolution.- forest management of the mature trees in farrand's design, including the american beech grove.- meadow maintenance of farrand's five meadow rooms restored to warm season native grasses.- park-wide mitigation of stormwater damage through triage and concept design for a stormwater conveyance system to protect park resources.- dopc green jobs & green tech skills training for at-risk youth engaged in park restoration, stewardship, and advocacy.- skillin

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 52
  • Transparency & Controls: 84
  • Accountability: 82
  • Sustainability: 86
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 21.5%; rating input score 22
  • Program expense ratio: 87.1%; rating input score 87
  • Fundraising efficiency: $357.56 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 75.3%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.54; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -1.4% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 11.3% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 18.1% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 21.5% of revenue deployed · 87.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $144K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 19 of 20 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 22/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 53/100.