Duluth Lions Club Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 815401727
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2018, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2016
- Location
- Duluth, MN, USA
- Phone
- 2183102247
- Rating
- 40
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Public Foundations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $83,364
- Expenses
- $41,743
- Assets
- $168,291
- Liabilities
- $5,884
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Bonnie Jorgenson (President)
- Gerry Sjerven (1st Vice President)
- Scott Morley (2nd Vice President)
- Marie Pank (Past President)
People named in this filing
- Bonnie Jorgenson (President)
- Patricia Swenson (Secretary)
- James J Denney (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Form 990-EZ Part III Primary Exempt Purpose See Schedule O
What it reported doing in 2025
Youth Environmental and Service Duluth Lions members provide volunteer support for various local projects and events benefiting kids including Grandmas Whipper Snapper races Bentleyville Tour of Lights Salvation Army food and gift distribution Chester Bowl ski races collection of soft plastic for recycling assembling snack packs and procuring food and supplies for the Ronald McDonald House Recycled over 3000 pounds of soft plastic which earned the organization 2 benches from Trex which were donated to a youth baseball field and a church Grants totaled 8818
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 75
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 49.9%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.03; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -94.6% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.6% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 15.3% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 17 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 20/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.