Duke Raleigh Hospital Guild
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 202942711
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Raleigh, NC, USA
- Phone
- 9198625968
- Rating
- 69
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $68,366
- Expenses
- $31,933
- Assets
- $488,401
- Liabilities
- $3,096
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KATHY POTTER (PRESIDENT)
- KATHERINE HENDERSON (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
- TRACY HAUSFELD (PAST-PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- KATHY POTTER (PRESIDENT)
- KATHERINE HENDERSON (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
- TRACY HAUSFELD (PAST-PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Organized to support duke university health system, inc. By assisting duke raleigh hospital (drh) to advance the good and welfare of drh by the use of the talents and abilities of the members of the corporation; to voluntarily render financial or other assistance directly or indirectly to patients of drh in need; to contribute, financially and otherwise, toward the work of drh; and to engage in work projects for the benefit of drh and its patients.
What it reported doing in 2024
Operation of the guilded lily gift shop located inside the duke raleigh hospital, providing flowers, gifts and other items for the cheer and well being of the patients and employees of duke raleigh hospital.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 84% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 79% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and liabilities are high compared with assets.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 65
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Sustainability: 81
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 51.2%; rating input score 51
- Program expense ratio: 89.3%; rating input score 89
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 53.3%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 15.29; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 0.4% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.8% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 51.2% of revenue deployed · 89.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $29K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 7 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 51/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 31/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.