Duke Health Lake Norman Regional Medical Center Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 332476324
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Durham, NC, USA
- Phone
- 9196688910
- Rating
- 57
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Hospitals and Related Primary Medical Care Facilities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $34,569,930
- Expenses
- $36,021,778
- Assets
- $313,555,900
- Liabilities
- $12,198,310
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CRAIG T ALBANESE MD (DIRECTOR/PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- CRAIG T ALBANESE MD (DIRECTOR/PRESIDENT): $2,338,899 total reported compensation
- THOMAS A OWENS MD (DIRECTOR/SECRETARY): $1,929,950 total reported compensation
- LISA M GOODLETT (DIRECTOR/TREASURER): $1,315,876 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
See schedule o
What it reported doing in 2024
Duke health lake norman hospital is a 123-bed acute care hospital serving residents of iredell county and the surrounding area. The hospital provides 24-hour emergency care, labor and delivery services, cardiology, general surgery, orthopedics, wound care, and outpatient imaging services.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 77
- Transparency & Controls: 60
- Accountability: 28
- Sustainability: 55
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 87.6%; rating input score 88
- Program expense ratio: 84.1%; rating input score 84
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -4.2%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 8.7; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0.5%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 87.6% of revenue deployed · 84.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 3 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $30.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $2.3M · 3 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 53 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 18/100.