Duggal Big Picture Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 261408487
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2016–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2012
- Location
- Brooklyn, NY, USA
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Expenses
- $2,303
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JUAN MARTINEZ (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- MICHAEL DUGGAL (CHAIRMAN)
- JUAN MARTINEZ (PRESIDENT)
- JERID O'CONNELL (VICE PRESIDE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission is to inspire, educate, and empower children through exposure to photography and arts at a young age. By teaching them the joys and practical skills of the visual arts, we enable them to explore their own creative potential and self-worth, methods proven to boost confidence in all other areas of life. It is important for us not only to inspire children to dream big, but to cultivate programs and partnerships that ensure they will have the necessary resources to achieve their goals now and in the future. All of us at the duggal big picture foundation volunteer our time so that 100% of our donations can put towards achieving our goals. Giving children a chance for their creativity to flourish empowers them to create beauty in their lives, in their community, and in the world at large.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 38
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 10
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -36.3% per year; rating input score 0; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -44.2% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -39.9% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 2 of 2 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2016 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 13/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.