Dudes for Dads

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
883271999
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Arlington, VA, USA
Phone
7038697530
Rating
54
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$167,588
Expenses
$148,793
Assets
$94,875

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DUSTIN GOODWIN (PRESIDENT & EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • TOMAS PANQUEVA (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • DUSTIN GOODWIN (PRESIDENT & EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • TOMAS PANQUEVA (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • MAXIMILIAN GIESEMAN (FUNDRAISING DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our mission is to guide and support children who have lost their father figure or never had one, through academics, athletics and grief support. At dudes for dads, we believe in the power of compassion the strength of community, and the joy of shared memories.

What it reported doing in 2025

New York city and arlington va scholarship$10000 and $6200 annual scholarships

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 13
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 48
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 12.2%; rating input score 12
  • Program expense ratio: 13.7%; rating input score 14

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 11.2%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.64; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 56.2% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 79.3% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 22% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 12.2% of revenue deployed · 13.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $20K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 12/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 14/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 58/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.