Duc Son Temple
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 883855578
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2023–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Houston, TX, USA
- Phone
- 8328982828
- Rating
- 64
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Buddhism
- Affiliation
- Buddhism
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $87,769
- Expenses
- $57,119
- Assets
- $626,718
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
1 person listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LANH X TRAN (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- LANH X TRAN (PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To nbsp; establish nbsp; a nbsp; place nbsp; of nbsp; worship nbsp; study nbsp; and nbsp; practice nbsp; for nbsp; buddhist nbsp; members nbsp; to nbsp; proliferate nbsp; the nbsp; teaching nbsp; of nbsp; buddha nbsp; and nbsp; to nbsp; build nbsp; happiness nbsp; and nbsp; peace nbsp; for nbsp; the nbsp; individuals nbsp; the nbsp; family nbsp; and nbsp; society
What it reported doing in 2025
Yearly program service of the temple for teaching and serving buddhist members.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 56% for direct work, and 44% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 69
- Transparency & Controls: 81
- Accountability: 18
- Sustainability: 72
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 65.1%; rating input score 65
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 80%; rating input score 80; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: Limited
- Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 34.9%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 10.97; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 150% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 25% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 65.1% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $57K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
- Consistency: 15 of 17 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes grants
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Fund balance restriction sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 58/100.