Dubuque Museum of Art
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 421071185
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023, Form 990-T 2023
- Location
- Dubuque, IA, USA
- Phone
- 5635571851
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Arts, Cultural Organizations - Multipurpose
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,348,188
- Expenses
- $1,376,873
- Assets
- $5,966,859
- Liabilities
- $410,808
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
31 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROBERT WETHAL (VICE PRESIDENT)
- ANDREW BUTLER (PRESIDENT)
- EMILY DUEHR (VICE PRESIDENT)
- GARY STOPPELMAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- GARY STOPPELMAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $128,031 total reported compensation
- EMMA STAPLETON (DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR): $114,820 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To excite, engage & educate constituents through the presentation of collections, exhibitions, and programming; to form mutually beneficial partnerships that will enhance the role of the arts within the community.
What it reported doing in 2023
Art shows - provided to the general public to inspire and promote creativity and knowledge of the arts by aspiring artists. Shows provide a gallery for artists and critics to express themselves to the community.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 79% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 60
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 47
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 66.7%; rating input score 67
- Program expense ratio: 62.6%; rating input score 63
- Fundraising efficiency: $4.77 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -2.1%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.33; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 17.6%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 8.9% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.8% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.5% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 66.7% of revenue deployed · 62.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 24 of 24 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $861K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $128K · 31 people listed
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2012 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 17/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 32/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 17/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 49/100.