Dubois Continuum of Care Community Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 251352326
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Dubois, PA, USA
- Phone
- 8143759100
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Nursing, Convalescent Facilities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $16,490,661
- Expenses
- $17,814,378
- Assets
- $10,708,139
- Liabilities
- $8,640,584
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KRISTIE JOHNSTON (PRESIDENT)
- RICHARD KIRSCH (VICE PRESIDENT)
- ROBERT JAVENS (PAST PRESIDENT)
- KAREN BROWN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (PAID BY CHR))
People named in this filing
- KRISTIE JOHNSTON (PRESIDENT)
- RICHARD KIRSCH (VICE PRESIDENT)
- ROBERT JAVENS (PAST PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization operates a continuing care retirement community, with 140 nursing beds, 23 independent living units and a 118-bed personal care facility.
What it reported doing in 2024
Operation of continuing care retirmenet community, focusing on lower-income residents funded by medicaid programs or providing charity care to financially indigent residents of clearfield county, pennsyllvania requiring long term care services. Dubois continuum of care community had a total census for low-income medicaid residents of 24,841 days in 2024 (60.68% of total residents served). The reimbursement for these residents was an average of $239.61 per day, while the cost of providing service to these residents was approximately $304.04 per day. Reimbursement was approximately $1,600,485 less than the cost to provide services to these low-income medicaid eligible residents. This shortfall constitutes "charity care".
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 96% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 93
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 24
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 95.2%; rating input score 95
- Program expense ratio: 88.7%; rating input score 89
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -8%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.6; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.81; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.4% per year; rating input score 100; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1% per year; rating input score 100; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -2.2% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 95.2% of revenue deployed · 88.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $15.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $3.5M reported
- Consistency: 29 of 30 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 20/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 13/100.